COURT VERDICT: David Mark Accuses Governor Ortom of Being behind his Court Ordeal
Just days back the election of the
Former Senate President David Mark was nullified and in response, Governor
Ortom through his media aide denied any involvement in the case. Well, the Former
Senate President, David Mark has replied Benue State Governor, Samuel Ortom on
his claim that the state government was not behind the nullification of
his (Mark) election saying the Governor’s quick response even when he wasn’t accused was rather suspicious.
his (Mark) election saying the Governor’s quick response even when he wasn’t accused was rather suspicious.
Mark’s fifth term election into the
8th assembly was nullified by the Appellate Court over irregularities and
electoral malpractices at the polls.
Ortom, while reacting to the
development, exonerated his government from Mark’s political misfortunes,
saying that he never interfered in the verdict that upturned the tribunal’s
earlier ruling.
Reacting to Ortom’s submission, Mark
in a statement by his Special Adviser on Media, Paul Mumeh, said he could read
between the lines the circumstances that led to his ouster.
His statement reads.
“We do not intend to join issues
with anyone over the decision of the Court of Appeal in Makurdi, Benue state, that
voided the election of the former President of the Senate, Senator David Mark,
as Senator representing Benue South
“But we found it curious that the
state governor, Chief Samuel Ortom, can come up with a frantic denial of
playing any role in the judicial decision as if he sat on the panel.
“It is even more strange that Ortom,
through his media adviser, Terve Akase, said his boss neither interferred nor
influenced the judgement whereas nobody had accused or mentioned the governor’s
name in any blame sharing.
“It is trite saying in African
tradition that if an owl cried in the night and a child dies the following
morning, we do not need to ask who killed the child.
“Would it be wrong to conclude
therefore that Ortom, through his media adviser, has personally or vicariously,
taken responsibility for the panel decision to rule against Senator Mark?
“On our part, we believe in the
independence of the judiciary as the last hope of the common man but the
Governor’s quick denial of any role in the judgement, even when he had not been
accused, is a subtle narrative of the role the state government played in this
bizzare decision of the Appeal panel.
“In Benue South, hate him or love
him, Senator Mark adorns a garment washed by God which no man can stain.
“If for whatever reason, the
justices of Appeal Tribunal found merit in awarding victory to a man who
neither participated nor contested the election in the real sense of the word,
we hail their ingenuity.
“For us, it is more revealing that
the Appeal panel did not question or disapproved the results of the election
but found comfort in conflict in dates signed by the INEC returning officer for
no fault of Sen. Mark as if that was more relevant than the votes that count
and were counted.
“Nothing can be farther from the
truth. Our people voted overwhelmingly for Sen. Mark on march 28th 2015 and are
prepared to do same even now. No amount of external forces or harassment can
undermine the resolve of our people .
“It is no longer a surprise that
people forget their yesterday with ease but we wish Ortom well.”
Comments
Post a Comment
The views expressed in comments published on my blog are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of queendoosh.com. Please take note.